maybe i'm just being hard to please.
first off, turns out i totally misdiagnosed christ community church (where i went three weeks ago). in reality, the leadership is a good bit reformeder than me (which, granted, isn't saying
that much). and, as if to drive the point home, today's sermon was a nice yay-luther-boo-catholics session on justification by faith. sigh.
(ok, i should be fair. it wasn't exactly "boo catholics"--certainly much, much more charitable than some i've heard. the pastor didn't question their salvation or nonsense like that. he mentioned that he had a smart catholic friend read over the sermon before he gave it, which was definitely a good move. he was really trying hard to play fair, and he deserves credit for it.
but when he tried to make clear contrasts between protestant and catholic doctrine, i think he maybe tried too hard--because his catholic version sounded so obviously more correct! more
biblical. honestly, a lot of what protestants say about justification make god sound just silly and arbitrary. he also (like most everyone on this topic) slippery-sloped wantonly--you know, "doctrine X can lead to error Y; (therefore X is false)". i got news: the truth is
always on a razor's edge in a sea of error. if i may mix weird metaphors.
it is true, by the way, that catholics say some stuff about "merits" that sounds pretty weird to me. but i suspect i may just be misunderstanding some medievalese, because the conclusions they draw from the logic of merits sound perfectly sensible ("Man's merit...is due to God", Catechism par. 2008).)
but i digress. point is, i seem to find myself somehow landed with a mess of
views (how did this happen? i always thought i was mister know-nothing ecumenical!) that are gonna knock any church i set foot into out of the running. between views and church, which shall give way? the views, of course. how they give way remains to be seen.